Evaluation of Assessment Method to Incorporate Graduate Attributes in Building Surveying Module

  • Sandeep Chowdhry Lecturer, School of Engineering, Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland, U.K.
  • Celine Garnier Lecturer, School of Engineering, Edinburgh Napier University, Scotland, U.K.
Keywords: Graduate Attributes, Problem-Based Learning, Assessment Strategy, Employability Skills, Assessment Evaluation

Abstract

This study aims at finding out whether an alternate assessment strategy in Sustainable Developments module to improve the student’s employability skills and qualities. The exploratory studies, quantitative and qualitative questions acted as a data gathering instruments. The findings showed a need to change the current assessment strategy for Sustainable Developments module, proposed a new assessment approach and evaluated it. The research infers the studied institution should encourage academic staff to get familiar with the effective learning strategies, students learning styles and how to assess an assessment plan with graduate attributes model. A suggested direction for further research is to create an assessment model based on the students learning styles, assessment strategies and the workload information.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Benzies, A. (2011) EDU11114 – Assessment, Evaluation and Support - Module Handbook.
[2] Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 19 (1), 57–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105.
[3] Biggs, J. and Tang, C., (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Third Edition. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[4] Biggs, J., (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Second edition. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[5] Biggs, J. & Tang, C., (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Third Edition. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[6] Black, P.J., Harrison, C. (2004). Science Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Science Classroom.
[7] Bloom, B. S. et al, (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: the classification of educational goals. Vol.2. London: Longman
[8] Boud, D. (1986) Implementing student self-assessment. Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia. Green Guide No. 5.
[9] Boud, D. (2000) Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 2, 151-167. http://dx.doi.or g/10.1080/713695728
[10] Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. (1999) Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 4, 413-426. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0260293990240405
[11] Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997) The challenge of problem-based learning. (2nd ed.) London: Kogan Page.
[12] Brown, S and Knight, P. (1994), Assessing Learners in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.
[13] Brown, S. (2004-2005) Assessment for learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 81-89.
[14] Brown, G.; Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997) Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
[15] Chambers, E. (1992) Workloads and the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 17, 2, 141-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079212331382627
[16] Cox, K. R. (1976) How did you guess? Or what do multiple choice questions measure? Medical Journal of Australia, 1, 884–886.
[17] Cowan, J., (1998). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
[18] Crooks, T.J. (1988). The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students. (14), 438–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
[19] Cuseo, J. (1992) Cooperative learning: A pedagogy for diversity. Cooperative Learning & College Teaching, 3, 1, 2-6.
[20] De Wilde, P and Pilkington, B. (2006) Education in environmental construction at the University of Plymouth: the Eco-House Project. Proceedings of PLEA2006 - The 23 rd Conference of Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland. September 2006, 773-778.
[21] Edinburgh Napier University. (2009). How was the Edinburgh Napier Graduate Attributes model developed? Retrieved July 19, 2015, from http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/sas/stu - dent_development/EnhancingtheCurriculum/graduate_attributes/Pages/Howwasthemodeldeveloped.aspx
[22] Edinburgh Napier University (2010) Learning, Teaching and Assessment Strategy: 2010- 2015. Available at: http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/academicdevelopment/LTA/Docu - ments/LTA%20STRATEGY%202010-2015%20WEB.pdf. Last accessed: 08/07/13.
[23] Edinburgh Napier University (2011a) Effective Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Contexts Module Handbook.
[24] Edinburgh Napier University - ENU (2011 b) Edinburgh Napier University Strategy 2015 – Summary of Key Performance Indicators. Available at: http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/ secretary/governance/govman/court/Documents/chair/Edinburgh%20Napier_KPI%20 Summary_20111114.pdf. Last accessed: 24/02/12
[25] Edinburgh Napier University (2012a) Assessment Handbook: An integrative approach to enhancing our practice, October 2012.
[26] Edinburgh Napier University (2012b) University Quality Framework Section1: the approval of modules and programmes. Available at: http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/sas/ academic_quality/ExternalExaminersArchive/Documents/Approval%20procedure%20 2012-13%20%28updated%20Aug%2012%29.pdf. Last accessed: 08/07/13
[27] Edinburgh Napier University (2013) Guidance for completing the Module Descriptor. Available at: http://staff.napier.ac.uk/services/sas/academic_quality/QualityFramework/ Pages/Approvals.aspx. Last accessed: 08/07/13
[28] Falchikov, N. (2002) In: Assessment: Case-studies, experience and practice from higher education Eds. Schwartz, P. and Webb, G. Chapter 9: ‘Unpacking’ Peer Assessment. Lon - don: KoganPage.
[29] Garnier, C. (2011) Part 3: Module Descriptor Critique. EDU11105 Module 1: Effective Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Contexts.
[30] Gibbs, G. (1992) Improving the quality if student learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
[31] Gibbs, G. (2006) In: Innovative Assessment in Higher Education Eds. Bryan C. & Klegg K. Chapter 2: How assessment frames student learning. Abingdon: Routledge
[32] Gibbs, G; Habeshaw, S. and Habeshaw, T. (1992) 53 interesting ways to teach large class - es. Fourth edition. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services.
[33] Higher Education Academy. (2011). Assessment Audit Tool. Retrieved March 2, 2015, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/assessment-audit-tool
[34] Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. , 67-78. Higher education and the life-course .
[35] Johnstone, A. H. and Ambusaidi, A. (2000) Fixed response: what are we testing? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 3, 323–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ b0rp90014a
[36] Juwah, C., Macfarlane-Dick, D., Matthew, B., Nicol, D., Ross, D., Smith, B. (2004). Enhancing student learning through effective formative feedback. Retrieved from http:// ctlt.illinoisstate.edu/downloads/modules/design/enhancing_learning-through_formative_ Chowdhry, S. Garnier, C. 128 feedback.pdf
[37] Kelvin H. K. Tan, K.H.K., Prosserc, M. (2004). Qualitatively different ways of differentiating student achievement: a phenomeno graphic study of academics’ conceptions of grade descriptors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (3), 267–282. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0260293042000188230
[38] Keppell, M., & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: A technology-based case study. Assessment in Education, 13 (2), 179–191. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/09695940600703944
[39] Klegeris, A., Hurren, H. (2011). Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills. Advances in Physiology Education, 35 (4), 408–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00046.2011
[40] Kneale, P. And Collins, C. (1996) Study Skills for Psychology. London: Arnold.
[41] Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential Learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[42] Lindberg-Sand,A., & Olsson,T. (2008). Sustainable assessment? Critical features of the assessment process in a modularised engineering programme. International Journal of Education Research, 47 (1), 165–174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.01.004
[43] London: Kogan Page. Supporting Student Learning: Case Studies, Experience, and Practice from Higher Education (2002).
[44] McDowell, L., Wakelin, D., Montgomery, C., King, S. (2011). Does assessment for learning - ing make a difference? The development of a questionnaire to explore the student response. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36 (7), 749–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080 /02602938.2010.488792
[45] Miller, N. (2002). Alternative forms of formative and summative assessment. The Handbook for Economics Lecturers. Online: http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/ assessment. Last Accessed: 03/07/2013.
[46] Nicol, D. (2007) E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31, 1, 53–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03098770601167922
[47] Nicol, D. J. & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learn - ing: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 2, 198–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
[48] Pan, W., Murray, P, Cotton, D. and Garmston, H. (2012) Integrating research-informed teaching into sustainable construction education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 7, 1, 94-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2012.07010094
[49] Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2006). Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in Higher Education: Assessment of Students. Online: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Pages/Code-of- practice-Section-6.aspx. Last Accessed: 03/07/2013.
[50] Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2007). Integrative Assessment: blending assignments and assessments for high-quality learning. Guide No. 3.
[51] Ramsden, P., (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge Falmer.
[52] Roberts, A. (2007) Problem based learning in architecture. CEBE Briefing Guide No. 11. Cardiff: Centre for Education in the Built Environment.
[53] Rodriguez, L. and Francisco Cano, F. (2007) The learning approaches and epistemological beliefs of university students: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 4, 647-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573807
[54] Sadlo, G. And Richardson J.T.E. (2003) Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253-274. http://dx.doi. org/10.1080/0729436032000145130
[55] Scouller, K. (1998) The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: - multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay . Higher Education, 35, 453–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003196224280
[56] Segers, M. and Dochy, F. (2001) New assessment forms in problem-based learning: the value-added of the students’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 3, 327-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076291
[57] Schmidt, N.; Norman, G. and Boshuzen, H. (1990) A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and Implications. Academic medicine, 65, 611-621. http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001
[58] Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 (4), 331–347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099102
[59] Teixeira-Dias, José J.C., Jesus, H.P., Souza, F.N., and Watts,M. (2005). Teaching for quality learning in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (9), 1123–1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690500102813
[60] The Higher Education Academy (2011) Assessment Audit Tool - Centre for Bioscience. Online: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/resources/audit/assessment.pdf Last accessed: 03/07/2013.
[61] The Higher Education Academy (2011) Employability Audit Tool - Centre for Bioscience. Online: http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/ftp/resources/audit/employability.pdf Last accessed: 03/07/2013.
[62] University of Reading (2013) Assessing large numbers of students. Available at: http://www.reading.ac.uk/engageinassessment/assessing-large-groups/eia-assessing-large- groups.aspx. Last accessed: 25/06/13.
[63] Wood, D.F. (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem-based learning. British Medicine Journal, 326, 328-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
[64] Zakrzewski, S. and Bull, J. (1998) The mass implementation and evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 2, 141-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230203.
Published
2016-12-28
How to Cite
Sandeep Chowdhry, & Celine Garnier. (2016). Evaluation of Assessment Method to Incorporate Graduate Attributes in Building Surveying Module. Journal on Today’s Ideas - Tomorrow’s Technologies, 4(2), 118-171. https://doi.org/10.15415/jotitt.2016.42008
Section
Articles